Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice Wilson.
The single point presented in this case, is, whether the payee and holder of a negotiable note, with an assignment thereon to a third person, can, without a reassignment, maintain an action in his own name. The case of Brinkley v. Going, decided at the present terpa, is in every respect analogous to this one.. There it was decided that the payee could maintain the action in his own name. In conformity to that decision, the judgment of the court below must be affirmed. Eddy, for appellant.
Gatewood, for appellee.
Judgment affirmed.