LAW.coLAW.co

Elizabeth W. HOLLAND, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. McDonnell Douglas CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant; Donna BUSCHELMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. McDonnell Douglas CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant; Marjorie L. SCHILLER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. McDonnell Douglas CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant

United States Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals1975-06-26No. Nos. 9-22 to 9-24
519 F.2d 1086

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS

It appearing that the District Court correctly determined that the Petitions for Removal in the captioned cases were not timely filed in accordance with Chapter 89 of Title 28, U.S.Code § 1446(b), to which § 211 of the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970, as amended, is expressly made subject; and that Chapter 89, 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) proscribes review on appeal of the orders of the District Court remanding these cases to the State court. It is, therefore,

Ordered that these appeals are hereby dismissed.