Opinion of the Court by
Justice Lockwood.
This was a bill in chancery, filed by the complainant, to perpetuallyenjoin a judgment obtained in the Jackson circuit court, in favor of the defendants, against the complainant. The bill states that the recovery was had on a judgment obtained in the state of Kentucky. The court, after a careful perusal of the bill, are clearly of opinion that the bill discloses no ground for the interference of a court of equity. If the complainant could not prove his defense, it was his duty to have filed a bill of discovery when the suit in Kentucky was pending against him. The law is well settled, if a party has a legal defense to a suit at law, and neglects to make it at the proper time, he is precluded from seeking relief in equity. Judgment affirmed with costs, ,
Judgment affirmed.
Vide Hubbard v. Hobson, ante, 190. Crow’s executors v. Prevo, ante, 216.
See note to More et al. v. Bagley et al., ante, p. 94.