LAW.coLAW.co

SILENT SALES VENDING COMPANY, PLAINTIFF, v. NIPOLA PRODUCTS COMPANY, INCORPORATED, DEFENDANT

New Jersey Supreme Court1925-05-09
3 N.J. Misc. 525

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

This is the defendant’s petition for an order to take additional testimony under a rule to show cause why the plaintiff’s judgment should not be opened, which rule was discharged by this court after hearing at the last term. We have considered the petition and we are constrained to think that it cannot be granted without doing violence to our settled rules and practice.

The petition is denied accordingly.