Rish, C. J.
1. The extract from the charge upon which error is assigned was substantially correct in regard to the matters therein dealt with, and is not erroneous by reason of the fact that other and distinct propositions relating to the same subject were not embraced. 2. The evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to authorize the verdict, and no sufficient reason appears for reversing the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.