LAW.coLAW.co

Christopher E. DiPasquale, Appellant, v. Security Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York et al., Respondents

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division2004-12-07
13 A.D.3d 100785 N.Y.S.2d 335

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered October 6, 2003, which denied plaintiffs motion to vacate his default on an earlier dismissal motion for failure to state a cause of action, and to grant leave to amend his complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In order to vacate a default, a plaintiff must offer a reasonable excuse for the default and demonstrate merit to the complaint. Amendment of a complaint may be denied, in the exercise of discretion, where the proposed amended cause is also without merit (Ava & Co. v Olympic Tower Assoc., 259 AD2d 315, 316 [1999]). The original complaint was clearly without merit, and the proposed amended complaint sought to reinstate a claim that the court had already dismissed on the merits. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.