LAW.coLAW.co

Richardson v. Pitts

Supreme Court of Georgia1906-12-13
127 Ga. 107

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Lumpkin, J.

1. “Where each of two coterminous proprietors recognizes the ownership of the other, and that the tract of each is bounded by that of the other, the ascertainment of the true line between them fixes the extent of their respective tracts.” Phillips v. O’Neal, 87 Ga. 727; Farr v. Woolfolk, 118 Ga. 277. 2. There was sufficient evidence to authorize the charge complained of, and to support the verdict. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.