Lumpkin, J.
1. There was no question of manslaughter involved in this, case, anS. there was no error in not charging on that subject. 2. The verdict was supported by the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur..
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.
Lumpkin, J.
1. There was no question of manslaughter involved in this, case, anS. there was no error in not charging on that subject. 2. The verdict was supported by the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur..