LAW.coLAW.co

NAPIER et al. v. DILDAY

Oklahoma Supreme Court1913-06-10No. No. 4810
38 Okla. 365132 P. 1085

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

WILLIAMS, J.

The record shows that the finding made against the plaintiffs in error, upon which the judgment was rendered, was with the consent of their counsel. Consent ends all contention between the parties,- and there is nothing to- review on appeal. Baker v. Van Ness et al., 37 Okla. 122, 130 Pac. 536; Schmidt v. Oregon Gold Mining Co., 28 Ore. 9, 40 Pac. 406, 1014, 52 Am. St. Rep. 759, and authorities therein cited. ■ The proceeding in error is dismissed.

All the Justices concur.