LAW.coLAW.co

NATHAN, alias ARP, v. THE STATE

Supreme Court of Georgia1908-07-15
131 Ga. 48

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Fish, C. J.

(After stating the facts.) The charges on the subject of malice, upon which error was assigned, were given while the court was instructing the jury on that subject and explaining to them the difference between express malice and implied malice. The headnotes, when considered in connection with the preceding statement of facts, need no elaboration. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.