Curtis E. CRAWFORD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joseph M. BROOKS, Respondent-Appellee, and United States of America, Party in Interest; Curtis E. Crawford, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons; Regional Director Federal Bureau of Prisons; Joseph M. Brooks, Petersburg FCI Medium, Respondents-Appellees; Curtis E. Crawford, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joseph M. Brooks, Warden; Chairman, United States Parole Commission; District of Columbia Board of Parole, Respondents-Appellees

PER CURIAM.

Curtis E. Crawford appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying as moot his petitions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Crawford v. Brooks, No. CA-04-61 (E.D.Va. Sept. 21, 2004); Crawford v. Dir., Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-03-472 (E.D.Va. Sept. 21, 2004); Crawford v. Brooks, No. CA-04-59 (E.D.Va. Sept. 21, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED