LAW.coLAW.co

Michael T. MASUOKA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G.W. MURPHY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Employer; Argonaut Insurance Company, Inc., Insurance Carrier; John and Jane Does, Entities; Does Corporation, Entities; Does Partnership, Entities; John and Jane Does; Governmental Entities, Defendants-Appellees; Michael T. Masuoka, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G.W. Murphy Construction Company, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee, and Argonaut Insurance Company, Inc.; Kenneth T. Goya, Insurance Agent, Defendants

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2004-12-03No. Nos. 04-1041, 04-1568
114 F. App'x 119

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Michael T. Masuoka appeals the district court’s orders denying his various post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Constr. Co., Nos. CA-02-1671; CA-00-829 (E.D. Va. Dec. 2, 2003; filed Dec. 4 & entered Dec. 5, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED