PER CURIAM.
Johnny Jermane Smarr appeals from the district court’s order denying his “Motion to Compel Government for Specific Performance.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Smarr, No. CR-95-28 (W.D.N.C. July 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED