LAW.coLAW.co

In the Matter of Charles S. MORROW

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania1996-04-17No. No. 753, Disciplinary Docket No. 2—Supreme Court; No. 132 DB 88 Disciplinary Board
544 Pa. 114674 A.2d 1049

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 17th day of April, 1996, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated March 19, 1996, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted. Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.