PER CURIAM.
As required by the Supreme Court’s order of January 10, 1955, 348 U.S. 905, 75 S.Ct. 311, we have considered this case in the light of Holland v. United States, 348 U.S. 121, 75 S.Ct. 127; Friedberg v. United States, 348 U.S. 142, 75 S.Ct. 138; Smith v. United States, 348 U.S. 147, 75 S.Ct. 194; and United States v. Calderon, 348 U.S. 160, 75 S.Ct. 186, and have concluded that our decision of August 24, 1953, 206 F.2d 872, was correct. The District Court’s judgment is, therefore, again affirmed.