LAW.coLAW.co

Harry M. RUNKLE, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit1941-01-10No. No. 8395
117 F.2d 1014

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

The parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, having agreed to a compromise and settlement of the appeal taken herein, the terms of such compromise being set forth in the attached copy of the stipulation for remand with directions pursuant to agreement of parties, it is ordered that this cause, 39 B.T.A. 458, be and it hereby is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals with directions to modify its decision and to enter an order in accordance with the parties’ agreement in compromise providing that Harry M. Runkle has overpaid his income tax for the year 1931 in the sum of $10,644.30, and has overpaid interest (assessed and/or accrued) in connection therewith in the sum of $5,405.18, and that said amounts were paid after the mailing of the notice of deficiency and Harry M. Runkle is now entitled tothe refund thereof, together with interest on said amounts as provided by law.