This was understood to be sufficient; and the Vice-Chan-cellar was of opinion there was no necessity, in a case of this kind, for any of the affidavits mentioned in the 165th rule, (i. e. as to cohabitation, connivance at adultery or time.)
Borradaile vs. Borradaile
1 Edw. Ch. 40
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.