LAW.coLAW.co

STATE OF OREGON, Petitioner on Review, v. LUCILO ROMERO BARAJAS, Respondent on Review

Oregon Supreme Court1996-08-15No. CC 920534889; CA A75949; SC S41439
324 Or. 40920 P.2d 1097

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in the light of State v. Cookman, 324 Or 19, 920 P2d 1086 (1996). Gillette, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

concurring-in-part-and-dissenting-in-part opinion

GILLETTE, J.,

concurring in part, dissenting in part.

I concur in part and dissent in part for the reasons expressed in my concurring and dissenting opinion in State v. Cookman, 324 Or 19, 920 P2d 1086 (1996).