LAW.coLAW.co

Tingle v. Parten and others

New York Court of Chancery1838-06-26
3 Edw. Ch. 228

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

The Vice-Chancellor :

Notice of this motion was regular. The complainant’s delay warranted it; and the intention to make it has had the effect of expediting the cause. An order to dismiss the bill, for want of prosecution, would not now be proper; but the complainant must pay the costs of this motion to be taxed.