PER CURIAM:
Jose Alphonso Escamilla, Jr., appeals the 210-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to manufacture, distribute, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense methamphetamine and marijuana. Escamilla argues that the district court plainly erred in sentencing him under the Sentencing Guidelines in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). He argues that his Sixth Amendment right was violated because his sentence was enhanced based on facts which he did not admit were true.
Escamilla has not demonstrated that the district court would have imposed a different or a lesser sentence if it had been guided by the Booker holding. Thus, Escamilla has failed to show that the district court plainly erred in imposing his sentence. See United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 521-522 (5th Cir.2005), petition for cert. filed, — U.S. -, — S.Ct. -,-L.Ed.2d-, No. 04-9517 (U.S. Mar. 31, 2005). The sentenced is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.