PER CURIAM:
Hogan Tebbs Brooks appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to review or revoke an order of pretrial detention. We remanded the case to the district court for the limited purpose of rendering reasons for its denial. The district court issued an order setting forth its factual findings and its conclusion that Brooks should be detained because he is charged with a crime of violence and he poses both a flight risk and a danger to the community.
We review the order issued by the district court, not that of the magistrate judge. United, States v. Westbrook, 780 F.2d 1185, 1188 n. 4 (5th Cir.1986). Absent an error of law, this court will uphold a district court’s pretrial detention order if it is supported by the proceedings below. United States v. Rueben, 974 F.2d 580, 585 (5th Cir.1992).
The district court’s ruling is supported by the record. See United States v. Hare, 873 F.2d 796, 798 (5th Cir.1989). The pretrial detention order is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.