LAW.coLAW.co

Conley and Johnson, plaintiffs in error, vs. Palmer, defendant in error

New York Court of Appeals1849-03
2 N.Y. 182

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

The Court,

after advisement, were of opinion that the cause had been properly decided in the supi’eme court, and thereupon the judgment was affirmed. See Pike v. Madbury, 12 New Hamp. 262 ; Boutelle v. Nourse, 4 Mass. 431; Frost v. Rowse, 2 Greenl. 130 ; Beadleston v. Sprague, 6 Johns. 101.