PER CURIAM:
Mathurin Marc Olama Onana, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an August 4, 2004 order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his second motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as untimely filed and as exceeding the numerical limitations for motions to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (2005); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
By unpublished per curiam opinion filed on September 23, 2005, we initially dismissed the petition for review as moot. We subsequently granted Onanas petition for panel rehearing, vacating our earlier opinion.