LAW.coLAW.co

GILBERT, HARRIS & CO. v. WATZELHAN et al.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit1912-05-13No. No. 202
197 F. 315

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons fully set forth in Judge Hand’s opinion we think that, with the Albert patent in the prior art, the patent in suit is invalid for want of invention. The case being determined by the conclusion of invalidity, we express no opinion upon the question of infringement.

The decree of the Circuit (now District) Court is affirmed, with costs.