LAW.coLAW.co

L. E. WATERMAN CO. v. MODERN PEN CO.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit1912-06-07No. No. 208
197 F. 536

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

It is equitable that the penholders which the defendant has in good faith marked in accordance with Judge Hand’s-decree with the .suffix “not connected with the original Waterman pen,” or in accordance with the opinion of. this court before the use of the name “Arthur” was required, should • be permitted to be; sold and the order for the mandate may so provide. The application for further changes in the order is denied.