LAW.coLAW.co

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. AMY JANE SISK

Supreme Court of North Carolina1997-04-11No. No. 371A96
345 N.C. 749

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in the majority opinion by Judge Johnson. We hold that defendant’s petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue was improvidently allowed. AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.