LAW.coLAW.co

Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Quentin T. SUMNER, Senior Court Judge, Nash County; Rachel Joyner, Clerk, Superior Court, Nash County, Defendants-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2013-05-10No. No. 13-1420
521 F. App'x 163

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Arthur O. Armstrong appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Armstrong v. Sumner, No. 5:12-cv-00425-F, 2013 WL 556209 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.