LAW.coLAW.co

Ramona Ortiz, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant, and 240 West 98th Street Associates et al., Respondents

New York Court of Appeals2010-03-25
14 N.Y.3d 779898 N.Y.S.2d 544925 N.E.2d 582

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, defendant City of New York’s motion for summary judgment granted, the complaint and all cross claims against the City of New York dismissed, and certified question answered in the negative. No triable issue of fact exists as to whether the City created a dangerous condition that caused plaintiffs injuries.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Grapfeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.