PER CURIAM.
Federal inmate Kelly Jones appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Having carefully reviewed the district court’s factual findings for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo, see Hanegan v. Miller, 663 F.3d 349, 354 (8th Cir.2011), we agree with the district court’s analysis, see Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 454-56, 105 S.Ct. 2768, 86 L.Ed.2d 356 (1985) (requirements of due process are satisfied if “some evidence” supports disciplinary decision to revoke good-time credits); see also Harper v. Lee, 938 F.2d 104, 105-06 (8th Cir.1991) (per curiam) (where disciplinary rehearing rectified due process errors in first disciplinary hearing, prisoner was ultimately afforded his due process protections). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Arthur J. Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.