LAW.coLAW.co

Howell W. WOLTZ, TEP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FCI BECKLEY; FPC Beckley; John Grimes, Counselor; Beverly Smith, Case Manager; James Childress, Case & Unit Manager; M. Lewis, Unit Secretary; Gary Locke, Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce, Defendants-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2012-04-03No. No. 11-7470
470 F. App'x 143

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM:

Howell W. Woltz, TEP, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2006) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Woltz v. FCI Beckley, No. 5:10-cv-00487, 2011 WL 4916102 (S.D.W.Va. Oct. 17, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.