Dismissal of the proceeding was appropriate since it was brought more than 60 days after service of DHR’s determination (see Executive Law § 298; Matter of Gil v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 17 AD3d 365 [2005]). Concur—Gonzalez, EJ., Tom, Sweeny, Catterson and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
In the Matter of Jacquelyn E. Jackson, Appellant, v. N.Y.S. Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents
69 A.D.3d 501892 N.Y.S.2d 758
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.