The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record (see People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]). We do not find the officer’s account of the events to be implausible, and the evidence establishes that he had a sufficient opportunity to observe the apparent drug transaction. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Acosta, DeGrasse and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles Restivo, Appellant
69 A.D.3d 478891 N.Y.S.2d 647
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.