The appeal from the order dated March 23, 2007, must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from that order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; Zimnoch v Bridge View Palace, LLC, 69 AD3d 928 [2010] [decided herewith]). Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.
Andrzej Zimnoch et al., Respondents, v. Bridge View Palace, LLC, Appellant
69 A.D.3d 927892 N.Y.S.2d 788
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.