Leo STOLLER, Appellant, v. The SOCIETY FOR the PREVENTION OF TRADEMARK ABUSE LLC, (substituted for Central Mfg. Co.), Appellee, and Cardiotronics, Appellee; Leo Stoller, Appellant, v. The Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse LLC, (substituted for Central Mfg. Co.), Appellee, and Salt Production, Inc., Appellee; Leo Stoller, Appellant, v. The Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse LLC, (substituted for Central Mfg. Co.), Appellee, and Deck America, Inc., Appellee; Leo Stoller, Appellant, v. The Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse LLC, (substituted for Central Mfg. Co.), Appellee, and Intelligence Quotient International Limited, Appellee; Leo Stoller, Appellant, v. The Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse LLC, (substituted for Central Mfg. Co.), Appellee, and Matthew Montoya, John Ahern, Jose Liscano, Hector Saldivar, and Adrian Garcia, Appellees; Leo Stoller, Appellant, v. The Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse LLC, (substituted for Central Mfg. Co.), Appellee, and Hepa Corporation, Appellee; Leo Stoller, Appellant, v. The Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse LLC, (substituted for Central Mfg. Co.), Appellee, and Edwin K. Stephens, Appellee; Leo Stoller, Appellant, v. The Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse LLC, (substituted for Central Mfg. Co.), Appellee, and Stealth, Ltd., Appellee; Leo Stoller, Appellant, v. The Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse LLC, (substituted for Central Mfg. Co.), Appellee, and Board of Regents, The University of Texas System, Appellee

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit2009-05-05No. Nos. 2009-1198 to 2009-1206

353 F. App'x 426

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion · public domain

majority opinion

ON MOTION

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse LLC moves to dismiss each of the nine above-captioned appeals. Stealth, Ltd. joins the motion to dismiss appeal no.2009-1205 and the Board of Regents, The University of Texas System joins the motion to dismiss appeal no.2009-1206. Leo Stoller moves for an extension of time to respond to the motions to dismiss and submits oppositions to the dismissal motions. The court notes that Stoller has not paid the filing fee for any of the above-captioned appeals. In addition, the court determines, based on in forma pauperis motions submitted by Stoller in two contemporaneous appeals, nos.2009-1187 and 2009-1189, that Stoller is not eligible to proceed in forma pauperis in these appeals. Because the fee has not been paid and Stoller is not eligible to proceed in forma pauperis, the appeals are dismissed. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The appeals are dismissed.

(2) All pending motions are moot.

(8) All sides shall bear their own costs.