LAW.coLAW.co

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce Lee RICHARDSON, a/k/a Chino, Defendant-Appellant

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2014-04-01No. No. 13-8050
564 F. App'x 49

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bruce Lee Richardson appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to compel and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Richardson, No. 2:06-cr-00010-MR-1 (W-D.N.C. June 11, 2013; Dec. 2, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.