MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner Lamont Tarkington appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his motion for disclosure of cell site and cell tower records furnished in connection with a grand jury investigation under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)(3)(E)(i). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Tarkington’s motion. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e)(3)(E)(i); Douglas Oil Co. of California v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228, 99 S.Ct. 1667, 60 L.Ed.2d 156 (1979) (district court’s decision under Rule 6(e) reviewed for abuse of discretion). We express no opinion as to Tarkington’s entitlement to his cell site or cell tower records in either his pending state habeas proceedings or any subsequently filed federal habeas action.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.