LAW.coLAW.co

Kevin SNODGRASS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, and Uhuru Sekou Obataiye-Allah, Plaintiff, v. Harold W. CLARK, Director, DOC; Gerald K. Washington, Regional Director; R. Mathena, Warden; John Walrath, Assistant Warden; Shortridge, Operations Officer; J. Gallihar, Major; J. McQueen, Investigator; CCS, Central Classification Services; Swinney, Unit Manager; Kilbourne, Unit Manager; Sergeant Hall, Sergeant; Sergeant Ingle; L.T. Mullins, Lieutenant; Payne, Lieutenant; J. Messer, Grievance Coordinator; R. Mullins, Grievance Coordinator; J. Owens, Property; Vanover, Property; I.H.O. L. Mullins, Hearings Officer; Sergeant Sykes, Sergeant; c/o R. Brown; c/o Vanover; c/o Carter; c/o Messer; c/o Officer Messer; c/o Sheppard; c/o Dupie; c/o Sluss; c/o Akers; c/o Gibson; John Does; Jane Does; L.T. Lambert, Lieutenant; Lieutenant Blevins; Lieutenant Lyle; Sergeant Hill; Younce, Unit Manager; Sergeant Barton; Sergeant Miller, Defendants-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2015-04-22No. No. 14-7671
600 F. App'x 891

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.,

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Snodgrass, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders (1) dismissing this 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) action without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order; and (2) denying his motions for reconsideration and appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Snodgrass v. Clark, No. 7:14-cv-00257-GEC (W.D.Va. July 1 & Aug. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.