PER CURIAM.
In this direct criminal appeal, Thomas Freeman challenges the sentence the district court imposed after revoking his supervised release. Upon careful review, we conclude that the revocation sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Tyson, 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir.2005) (per curiam) (revocation sentences are reviewed for unreasonableness in accordance with United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
. The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.