Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Linda I. Valerino appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Valerino’s claims of employment discrimination, retaliation, and violations of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a (2012). Valerino also challenges several of the district court’s orders denying her motions for permission to file documents electronically, for recusal of the district court judge, for transfer of venue, and granting in part the Appellee’s motion for a protective order from further discovery. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court at the hearing on the Appellee’s summary judgment motion on July 25, 2014 and in its various underlying orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.