PER CURIAM:
Lee Mark Huggins, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Huggins, No. 4:00-cr-00503-CWH-17 (D.S.C. Feb. 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.