PER CURIAM:
Joseph V. Puranda appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Puranda v. Kellett, No. 3:10-cv-00336-HEH, 2011 WL 6742498 (E.D.Va. Dec. 22, 2011). We also deny Puranda’s motions for transcripts at government expense and for production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.