LAW.coLAW.co

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerardo VALDIVIA, Defendant-Appellant

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2012-05-18No. No. 11-10277
473 F. App'x 598

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

MEMORANDUM

Gerardo Valdivia appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found unlawfully in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Valdivia first contends that the district court proeedurally erred by failing adequately to explain the sentence imposed. The record belies this contention.

Valdivia next contends that the district court erred by misunderstanding its authority to depart downward based on cultural assimilation. The district court appears to have based its denial of a downward departure, at least in part, on a mistaken belief that a previously deported alien cannot rely on cultural assimilation as a ground for a departure. See U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 cmt. n. 8. However, any error is harmless because it did not affect the district court’s selection of the sentence imposed. See United States v. Ali, 620 F.3d 1062, 1074 (9th Cir.2010).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.