LAW.coLAW.co

Tomey et ux. v. Lambdin; Tucker et al. v. City of Los Angeles, California; Seisman v. Consumer Protection Division of the Office of the Attorney General of Maryland

Supreme Court of the United States2011-03-07No. No. 10-8196; No. 10-8228; No. 10-8516
562 U.S. 1269

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Ct. Sp. App. Md.;

C. A. 9th Cir.; and

Ct. Sp. App. Md. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until March 28, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.