ORDER
PER CURIAM
■ Earl. Chanpe Pitt (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his amended motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no. error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).