ORDER
PER CURIAM
Scott McCabe (Movant) appeals the judgment of Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. In one point on appeal, Movant argues that the motion court clearly erred by denying his motion for post-conviction relief because he established facts unrefuted by the record that his plea counsel was ineffective for advising him that if he entered a blind plea of guilty, he would be sentenced to a long-term drug treatment program, and as a result, Mov-ant’s plea was involuntary.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying post-conviction relief. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for. the use of the parties setting forth the- reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).