PER CURIAM.
We conclude that under the facts of this case, the trial court abused its discretion in denying the unopposed motion to vacate foreclosure sale. The record reflects that the parties had not engaged in dilatory tactics and- that granting the motion would not have unduly interfered with the efficient administration of justice. See Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Lupica, 36 So.3d 875, 876 (Fla. 6th DCA 2010). REVERSED and REMANDED.
PALMER, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.