ORDER
PER CURIAM
Darrell Bolden appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of multiple counts of robbery and armed criminal action.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).