PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order denying appellants’ motion to vacate final judgment. After having been provided an opportunity to do so, appellants have failed to provide a sufficient record or to overcome the presumption of correctness in the trial court’s ruling. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150- (Fla.1979).
In addition, we agree that appellants’ arguments could not be raised in a rule 1.540 motion to vacate as they were waived by the failure to assert them prior to final judgment. See Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Condo. Ass’n of La Mer Estates, Inc., 175 So.3d 282, 285 (Fla.2015); MCR Funding v. CMC Funding Corp., 771 So.2d 32, 35 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
CIKLIN, C.J., STEVENSON and MAY, JJ., concur.