ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Pamela D. Ramsey appeals the denial of her motion for a change of judge during the post-conviction proceedings and the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. We find no error has occurred. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).