PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Koster v. Sullivan, 160 So.3d 385 (Fla.2015); Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC v. Gibraltar Private Bank & Trust Co., 162 So.3d 1058, 1060 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)(stating “[i]f the return [of service] is regular on its face, then the service of process is presumed to be valid and the party challenging service has the burden of overcoming that presumption by clear and convincing evidence.”)(quoting Koster, 160 So.3d at 389).